🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."