🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.